American television series Succession has won critical acclaim for its portrayal of the Roy family, owners of a global media and entertainment conglomerate, as they vie for control of the business. Viewers can sit back and enjoy Succession’s "delightful vipers’ nest of Shakespearean betrayal," but can entrepreneurial families learn from it?
There are plenty of reasons this show has won such critical acclaim. Each episode shifts smartly up through the narrative gears, propelled by a script comprising of tack-tongued slights and absurd execuspeak. The plot is a delightful vipers’ nest of Shakespearean betrayal. The soundtrack is a visceral composition that teleports viewers to a world of stark hotel rooms and besuited boardroom savagery.
The premise that drives the plot is simple. A patriarch, Logan Roy, nearing retirement, and scheming heirs trying to finagle their way to the top job of Waystar Royco. The parallels with real-world business dynasties are clear. None more so than with News Corp owner Rupert Murdoch’s inner circle. Watching the action unfold against the backdrop of private jet cabins, Davos-style jamborees and palatial New York apartments you start to wonder: has James Murdoch ever accidentally sent a compromising photo to his father across a packed boardroom table?
But while this moment contains a clear lesson in boardroom etiquette for corporate princes on the make, I think that the show’s twenty-nine episodes hold further pointers for families considering a transfer of power.
Consultants who help companies ease in the next generation are unanimous in this view: initiating your offspring into the ways of the company is best done early. This means that those next in line will be better equipped if they’ve had a career long experience in absorbing the minutiae of what the company does. By the same token, aging founders clinging to the tiller should look at Logan’s approach and do the opposite. So cruel and inconsistent was his tutelage, that – so far – none of his grasping children are fit to take the reins.
Succession planning requires a network of senior mentors to support incoming bosses. Consider the role of characters like Frank Vernon, long-time confidant of Logan and vice-chairman of the company. Or Gerri Kellman, who assumes role of interim CEO in season three. These snivelling lackeys are treated contemptuously by the Roy family – Frank is fired by Logan in the first episode – but in real life, figures like them would be pivotal to coherent governance.
Crucially, they would provide some checks and balances in the face of an ambitious new broom arriving in the corner office. In the show, the Waystar Royco top brass appear as the least empowered, but the most temperate of the characters. This might not be so far from the truth in real family businesses.
Succession plans rarely materialise as first intended. Some take decades of upskilling and personal development before a young gun is ready to replace a senior member of a family firm. During this journey, candidates’ priorities, responsibilities and interests change.
An heir to a big pharma company might have their eye on the top job months after graduating from Harvard Business School, but will their ambition have changed in a decade or so’s time? It’s likely. The long timeframes associated with succession planning mean adaptability and flexibility are crucial to getting it to work.
In the series the Roys are certainly flexible. Logan seems to pivot from one favourite to another teasing that each might have earned enough regard to make them worthy of the company. There are fast role-reshuffles where members of the inner circle are catapulted into jobs they didn’t expect. But this is largely due to Logan Roy’s unreadable strategising. When it comes to managing his sons and daughter, he adopts an approach from the Putin playbook – he chides, then praises. He is erratic, but cunning. He leaves his adversaries (largely speaking, his children) bewildered trying to anticipate his next move.
By the close of season three, we are shown that Logan’s love for his sons and daughter pales in comparison with his desire to control the company – which seems more of a child to him than they do. This urge to beat all competition into pulp might be the thing most accountable for the main characters’ dysfunction. It is also an important element for maintaining the tension even after the end of the third season. This makes Succession the best modern story about the corrupting effect of power and greed.
But long before these two factors gain the upper hand at family businesses in the real world, family members would do well to think about what connects them beyond financial matters and what they want to leave behind for future generations.
This article first appeared in MAG/NET.
Read more from The Brief.
This communication is provided for information purposes only. The information presented herein provides a general update on market conditions and is not intended and should not be construed as an offer, invitation, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any specific investment or participate in any investment (or other) strategy. The subject of the communication is not a regulated investment. Past performance is not an indication of future performance and the value of investments and the income derived from them may fluctuate and you may not receive back the amount you originally invest. Although this document has been prepared on the basis of information we believe to be reliable, LGT Wealth Management UK LLP gives no representation or warranty in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented herein. The information presented herein does not provide sufficient information on which to make an informed investment decision. No liability is accepted whatsoever by LGT Wealth Management UK LLP, employees and associated companies for any direct or consequential loss arising from this document.
LGT Wealth Management UK LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom.